03/19/02
Opinion in some quarters is that a new bull market is now
in force, giving the green light for unrestrained purchase of
equities. While the
worst may be over, lingering effects of the deflated bubble economy
will be a damper on equity results for some time. The new “neutral” Greenspan
interest rate policy really means that interest rates will soon
be moving up from 40 year lows, a negative for bond and stock
prices alike. Bond
investors sitting on a 20% return over the past two years are
better prepared than those whose results were worse than or equaled
the S&P 500’s 20% decline over the same period.
Reported corporate earnings are going to be held hostage
to: draconian
accounting rules; a
likely cap on consumer spending (record levels of consumer debt,
exhaustion of home equity collateral and rising unemployment); delay in resurgence of
business investment (present overcapacity); and the dead weight of
increased interest charges on (again) record levels of corporate
debt.
Returns on the assets of corporate defined-benefit pension
plans have been strong contributors to reported earnings over the
past few years, companies coasting on accumulated surpluses. This is no longer the case
– IBM’s $10 billion
pension fund cushion was virtually wiped out last year, falling to $600 million. Many large companies assume
a 10% annual return on pension fund assets. For the two years ended ’01
returns should have cumulated to 121% of starting value. Assuming an 80% equity asset
allocation and the two-year returns for bonds and equities cited
above, the calculated result is only 88% of starting value. Suddenly, the fund is 38%
behind the curve. This
shortfall must be made up going forward, plus amounts by which
actual future positive results fail to reach actuarial
assump-tions. Current
low cash yields on bonds and low earnings yields on equities are not
conducive to double digit annual returns. Companies must resume
contributions to their defined-benefit pension plans (about 50% of
the retirement plan universe), penalizing reported earnings. Not to mention the balance
of payments deficit, which will soon require a $2 billion daily
injection of foreign capital to keep the U.S. economy on an even
keel.
Market risk is asymmetrical at the moment – present
valuations cannot be sustained if earnings are worse than
expected; better than
expected earnings are unlikely to move valuations much
higher.
What to do? In
the fixed-income area there are many good quality preferred issues
yielding 8% to 9%.
There are also some misunderstood and mispriced corporate
bond issues maturing in less than five years which offer, in our
opinion, well-protected double digit yields. Equity selection is more
problematic, turning on individual risk tolerance and investment
horizon. Candidates can
be found in energy, health care, financials and certain areas of
technology.
William
Wright